1951 Allard K2 vs. 2009 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2009 GMC Canyon is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Canyon (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1283 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2009 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Allard | GMC |
Model | K2 | Canyon |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |