1951 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K2 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |