1951 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |