1951 Allard K2 vs. 2010 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2010 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 415 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2010 Ascari KZ1 | |
Make | Allard | Ascari |
Model | K2 | KZ1 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1138 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2636 mm |