1951 Allard K2 vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Chrysler 200 has automatic transmission and 1951 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1951 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chrysler 200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Allard | Chrysler |
Model | K2 | 200 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2766 mm |