1951 Allard K2 vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 511 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | K2 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1706 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3881 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1826 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2423 mm |
