1951 Allard K2 vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Allard | Peugeot |
Model | K2 | RCZ |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1359 mm |