1951 Allard K2 vs. 2012 BMW M3
To start off, 2012 BMW M3 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 329 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW M3 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2012 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Allard | BMW |
| Model | K2 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1803 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1424 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2761 mm |
