1951 Allard K2 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Allard | Citroen |
| Model | K2 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
