1951 Allard K2 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 396 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Allard K2 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1591 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |