1951 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1951 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1951 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Alvis TB 21 | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Alvis | Land Rover |
| Model | TB 21 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2890 mm |
