1951 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Aston Martin DB3 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1951 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Aston Martin DB3 | 2003 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mitsubishi |
Model | DB3 | eK |
Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |