1951 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1951 Aston Martin DB3. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1951 Aston Martin DB3.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Aston Martin DB3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Aston Martin DB3. (243 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Aston Martin DB3 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Aston Martin | Citroen |
Model | DB3 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 243 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |