1951 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1951 Aston Martin DB3. (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1951 Aston Martin DB3.
Because 1951 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Aston Martin DB3. (243 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Aston Martin DB3.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Aston Martin DB3 | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Aston Martin | Saturn |
Model | DB3 | Outlook |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 243 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1990 mm |