1951 Austin A 110 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 110 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Austin A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Austin A 110 (287 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 1951 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 110 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 110 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1951 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 287 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2210 mm |