1951 Austin A 110 vs. 2001 Suzuki SX

To start off, 2001 Suzuki SX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Austin A 110 (130 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 110 weights approximately 439 kg more than 2001 Suzuki SX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Austin A 110 (287 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 1951 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX. 2001 Suzuki SX has automatic transmission and 1951 Austin A 110 has manual transmission. 1951 Austin A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Suzuki SX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: