1951 Austin A 110 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Austin A 110 (130 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Austin A 110 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1951 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Austin A 110 (287 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (115 Nm). This means 1951 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 110 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 110 | Aveo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 287 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 46 L |