1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1955 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1955 Maserati A6G is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 40 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 40 | 1955 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | A 40 | A6G |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2560 mm |
