1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1958 Talbot T 26 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 40 | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Austin | Talbot |
Model | A 40 | T 26 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1890 mm |