1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1961 Simca 1000
To start off, 1961 Simca 1000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Simca 1000 (51 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Simca 1000 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 40 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1961 Simca 1000.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Austin A 40 (80 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Simca 1000. (73 Nm). This means 1951 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 40 | 1961 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Austin | Simca |
Model | A 40 | 1000 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 944 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 73 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 36 L |