1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1962 DKW Munga is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Austin A 40 (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 120 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 40 | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 40 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 68 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 31 L |
