1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1964 Buick Electra
To start off, 1964 Buick Electra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Buick Electra weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 40 | 1964 Buick Electra | |
| Make | Austin | Buick |
| Model | A 40 | Electra |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3210 mm |
