1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 780 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 40 | 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | |
| Make | Austin | Pontiac |
| Model | A 40 | Bonneville |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3130 mm |
