1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1978 Chrysler 160

To start off, 1978 Chrysler 160 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chrysler 160 (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1978 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Austin A 40 1978 Chrysler 160
Make Austin Chrysler
Model A 40 160
Year Released 1951 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 1639 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 38 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 133 Nm
Torque RPM 2300 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1085 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2680 mm