1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1980 Fiat 128
To start off, 1980 Fiat 128 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Fiat 128 (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Fiat 128 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 40 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1980 Fiat 128.
Because 1951 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 40 | 1980 Fiat 128 | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | 128 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1116 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |