1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1986 Chrysler Daytona
To start off, 1986 Chrysler Daytona is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,210 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Chrysler Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chrysler Daytona (243 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (83 Nm). This means 1986 Chrysler Daytona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 40 | 1986 Chrysler Daytona | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 40 | Daytona |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 243 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
