1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1987 Lada Samara
To start off, 1987 Lada Samara is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Lada Samara (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 40 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara.
Because 1951 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 40 | 1987 Lada Samara | |
Make | Austin | Lada |
Model | A 40 | Samara |
Year Released | 1951 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 60.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 43 L |