1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 301 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 355 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (83 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Austin A 40 1996 Ford Mustang
Make Austin Ford
Model A 40 Mustang
Year Released 1951 1996
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 49 HP 350 HP
Torque 83 Nm 556 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 990 kg 1345 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2580 mm