1951 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 1999 Nissan SUT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan SUT (140 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (80 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 40 | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | SUT |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
