1951 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 BMW M3

To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (80 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Austin A 40 2002 BMW M3
Make Austin BMW
Model A 40 M3
Year Released 1951 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 3246 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 38 HP 338 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 7400 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 355 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1595 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 67 L