1951 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 517 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (262 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (83 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 40 | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 40 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 262 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 62 L |