1951 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (187 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (440 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 40 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 40 | R |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5156 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1661 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3216 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 80 L |