1951 Austin A 70 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 850 kg more than 1951 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 70 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 70 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |
