1951 Austin A 70 vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1965 Lincoln Continental is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1126 kg more than 1951 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 70 | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Austin | Lincoln |
| Model | A 70 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 90 L |
