1951 Austin A 70 vs. 1968 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1968 Ford 12 M is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Austin A 70 (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Ford 12 M. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 70 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1968 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 70 | 1968 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 70 | 12 M |
Year Released | 1951 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1182 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |