1951 Austin A 70 vs. 1974 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1951 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 70 | 1974 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 70 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1951 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 7732 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3390 mm |