1951 Austin A 70 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 394 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A 70. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A 70.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 70 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 70 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2580 mm |