1951 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 681 kg more than 1951 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 70 | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 70 | Compass |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1951 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 51 L |