1951 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 70 weights approximately 214 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1951 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 70 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | A 70 | Polo |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |