1951 Austin A 70 vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (148 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70.
Because 1951 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 70 | 2009 Jeep Patriot | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 70 | Patriot |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
