1951 Austin A 70 vs. 2009 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2009 Lotus Elise is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Elise (219 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A 70 weights approximately 389 kg more than 2009 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 70 | 2009 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Austin | Lotus |
Model | A 70 | Elise |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 219 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 881 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 44 L |