1951 Austin A 70 vs. 2009 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 70.
Because 2009 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo XC70 has automatic transmission and 1951 Austin A 70 has manual transmission. 1951 Austin A 70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 70 | 2009 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 70 | XC70 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |