1951 Austin A 90 vs. 1965 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Calais is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 620 kg more than 1951 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A 90 | 1965 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 90 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |
