1951 Austin A vs. 1959 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1959 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 955 kg more than 1951 Austin A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A | 1959 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Impala |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 3851 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3030 mm |
