1951 Austin A vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cougar is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1951 Austin A. (29 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 975 kg more than 1951 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | A | Cougar |
Year Released | 1951 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 803 cc | 6392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2830 mm |