1951 Austin A vs. 1978 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 1978 Nissan Cedric is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Nissan Cedric (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1951 Austin A. (29 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 665 kg more than 1951 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Nissan Cedric (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A. (54 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1978 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Austin A 1978 Nissan Cedric
Make Austin Nissan
Model A Cedric
Year Released 1951 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 803 cc 1982 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 29 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 54 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 685 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 3470 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1410 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2030 mm 2700 mm