1951 Austin A vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1951 Austin A. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 310 kg more than 1951 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Austin | Matra-Simca |
| Model | A | Murena |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 116 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2440 mm |
