1951 Austin A vs. 1983 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Autobianchi A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Austin A weights approximately 19 kg more than 1983 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1951 Austin A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A | 1983 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Austin | Autobianchi |
Model | A | A 112 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 803 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 95 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 30 L |