1951 Austin A vs. 2000 GMC Jimmy
To start off, 2000 GMC Jimmy is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 4,298 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Jimmy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Jimmy (190 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1951 Austin A. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Jimmy should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1951 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Jimmy (340 Nm) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A. (54 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Jimmy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Austin A | 2000 GMC Jimmy | |
| Make | Austin | GMC |
| Model | A | Jimmy |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 803 cc | 4298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 29 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2720 mm |
