1951 Austin A vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1951 Austin A. (29 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1325 kg more than 1951 Austin A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Austin A. (54 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Austin A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 803 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 87 L |